Litigation is an important tool to defend and advance public health policy. This tracker provides information and official court documents from select lawsuits within the focus areas of the Public Health Law Center, including commercial tobacco control, climate justice, and healthy eating. Some cases are relevant to cross-cutting issues that affect public health, such as preemption and First Amendment considerations. The Public Health Law Center has supported public health goals as an amicus curiae, or friend-of-the-court, by filing briefs (included here) with relevant information that the court may choose to consider. You can read more about the Function and Role of Amicus Briefs in Public Health Litigation.
Public Health Topics
Displaying 1 - 10 of 134

Texas Tobacco Barn v. FDA (2025)

The tobacco industry challenged the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s assessment of a civil monetary penalty, arguing that it is entitled to a jury trial when assessed such a penalty.

State

Texas

Most Recent Activity

Status

Closed

Clean Energy Choice Coalition, NFP v. Village of Oak Park, IL (2025)

A coalition of propane, gas, construction, and landlord trade and labor groups has sued the Village of Oak Park, IL. The industry groups argue that ordinances updating the village’s energy code are preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (“EPCA”). Their argument is based on the inclusion of electrification requirements for certain new buildings in the village ordinances.

State

Illinois

Most Recent Activity

Status

Closed

R.J. Reynolds v. FDA (2020)

The tobacco industry sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on First Amendment grounds, challenging the agency’s graphic health warning label rule.

State

Texas

Most Recent Activity

Status

Open

Lighthiser et al. v. Trump (2025)

Twenty-two youth plaintiffs from five U.S. states (Montana, Florida, Oregon, California, and Hawai'i) filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging a set of Executive Orders (EO’s) written to undo climate protections, reject climate science, and maximize fossil fuel production.

State

Montana

Most Recent Activity

Status

Closed

Denver v. Philip Morris (2026)

The city of Denver filed suit against Philip Morris and other major tobacco manufacturers to hold them accountable for cigarette litter, with charges including public nuisance, trespass, negligence, and violation of state law.

State

Colorado

Most Recent Activity

Status

Open

Restaurant Law Center v. Denver (2024)

Trade associations representing restaurants, home builders, hotels, apartments, and propane sued the City and County of Denver over its building codes, arguing that they are preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (“EPCA”).

State

Colorado

Most Recent Activity

Status

Closed

Vapor Technology Association v. Wooten (2025)

In 2024, North Carolina passed H.B. 900 into law, which created an e-cigarette registry. The district court denied the plaintiff’s request to enjoin the law on the grounds that it is preempted, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed.

State

North Carolina

Most Recent Activity

Status

Open

Iowans for Alternatives to Smoking & Tobacco, Inc. v. Mosiman (2024)

In 2024, Iowa enacted House File 2677 (H.F. 2677), a law prohibiting the manufacture and sale of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in Iowa unless the products have received marketing authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or meet certain compliance criteria. A coalition of e-cigarette manufacturers, retailers, and consumers challenged the law, arguing it was preempted by federal law.

State

Iowa

Most Recent Activity

Status

Open

Maryland Building Industry Association, Inc. et al v. McIlwain (2025)

Trade groups for the gas industry, builders, building owners, and developers sued the Maryland Department of the Environment, arguing that the state’s Building Energy Performance Standards are preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA).

State

Maryland

Most Recent Activity

Status

Open