On December 20, 2019, the federal legal minimum age of sale for tobacco products was raised to 21. On January 2, 2020, the FDA finalized a guidance that attempts to combat the epidemic of youth e-cigarette use. Both of these actions have raised many questions about what will happen next and how these policies will affect efforts at the state and local level. This webinar will attempt to demystify both policies and explain everything that public health professionals need to know.
You are here
Communities are at the front line of navigating the rise in youth use of e-cigarettes, which some have termed a “Juul epidemic.” This webinar will describe the trends in youth use of Juul and other e-cigarette products, the public health harms of e-cigarette use, and the unique role schools play in addressing the epidemic.
The number of reported vaping-related lung injuries and deaths is increasing each week. At the same time, states and Tribes are taking various policy and regulatory approaches to combat these injuries and the broader epidemic of youth e-cigarette use throughout the United States. This webinar offers a state-by-state update on strategies used to respond to the outbreak of vaping-related health problems and widespread youth e-cigarette use, as well as considerations for best practices moving forward.
Every stage of the commercial tobacco lifecycle affects human health, ecosystems, and the global climate. These impacts begin with the cultivation and processing of tobacco plants and extend through product disposal. Around the world, massive amounts of forest are removed to make way for tobacco farmland and to provide wood for tobacco curing. Commercial tobacco agriculture degrades soil, exposes workers to hazardous pesticides and nicotine poisoning, and contributes to food insecurity. Cigarette butts spread toxic substances and pollution into waterways.
Communities are at the front line of navigating the rise in youth use of e-cigarettes, which some have termed a “Juul epidemic.” This webinar will address the trends in youth use of Juul and other e-cigarette products, the public health harms of e-cigarette use, and the unique role of schools in addressing the epidemic. Presenters will provide the latest information on how schools are addressing the problem and Public Health Law Center will present the highlights of a model policy for K-12 schools in Minnesota, including the elements necessary for a comprehensive and effective policy and the importance of ensuring youth use is addressed with approaches that effectively alleviate the addictive properties of nicotine in place of strictly punitive measures.
Some of the most effective tobacco control policies are developed at the local level before being replicated and often enhanced by state and other local governments. Preemption, which occurs when a higher governmental entity removes the authority of a local branch of government, threatens the ability of local public health leaders to execute their vision for tobacco control in their jurisdictions. In 2019, several state legislatures proposed measures that would preempt local jurisdictions from regulating tobacco products in some manner, demonstrating that preemption is still a crucial issue in tobacco control.
The Tobacco Control Network (TCN), a peer network of ASTHO, and the Public Health Law Center (PHLC) are organizing a three-part webinar series exploring what tobacco control stakeholders need to know about preemption and strategies to avoid it. This third and final webinar in the series will discuss opportunities to promote tobacco control and cessation at the state level when tobacco preemption limits local authority. This webinar will include a presentation from subject matter experts at the Public Health Law Center, accompanied by state level case studies from North Carolina and Oklahoma. All tobacco control stakeholders are invited to participate in this learning series.
July 2019 marks the first anniversary of the implementation of a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule prohibiting smoking in public housing. In this webinar, public health and housing law experts provide an overview of the HUD rule, highlight legal issues that have arisen since implementation, and discuss what's next for smoke-free housing.
This webinar was recorded on July 10, 2019.
The Public Health Law Center (PHLC) and the American Lung Association in California (ALA) were awarded a 5-year contract by the California Tobacco Control Program (CTCP) at the California Department of Public Health to support commercial tobacco control professionals and advocates in the work to end the commercial tobacco epidemic in California. The contract for the Law and Policy Coordinating Center began on July 1, 2019.
Some of the most effective tobacco control policies have been developed at the local level before being replicated and often enhanced by other state and local governments. Preemption, which occurs when a higher governmental entity removes the authority of a local branch of government, threatens the ability of local public health leaders to execute their vision for tobacco control in their jurisdictions.
Under the federal Controlled Substances Act, marijuana is currently categorized as a Schedule 1 drug – that is, a drug with high potential for abuse with no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the U.S. Despite the growing number of states that legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes or recreational use, it remains a federal offense to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell, purchase, possess, or use marijuana.
Localities have historically been, and continue to be, at the forefront of adopting innovative tobacco control policies that have diffused to other localities and higher governmental levels. Preemption withdraws power from localities and centralizes it at higher governmental levels, thus limiting localities’ ability to prioritize their own public health agendas to meet unique local needs.
As a result of the explosion of JUUL products leading to an unprecedented increase in youth e-cigarette use, state and local governments are considering a variety of policy options to regulate this rapidly expanding market. Taxation has proven to be one of the most effective methods to reduce youth cigarette use. To date, however, very few states have enacted e-cigarette taxes. In response to the epidemic of youth use, many states are considering taxing e-cigarettes, but it is still not clear how best to do so.
On March 13, 2019, the FDA issued a draft guidance document outlining its intentions to begin addressing the youth e-cigarette epidemic in a more robust fashion through enforcement of premarket review. This webinar walks through all the FDA’s proposed actions, providing context and analysis of the agency’s plan. We talk about the next steps for the FDA and the public health community, and answer questions.
This webinar has already occurred. Please use the resources below:
According to both the FDA Commissioner and the Surgeon General, youth nicotine addiction is now an epidemic, fueled by the soaring success of JUUL and similar e-cigarettes. Although this alarm is widely shared by public health officials at all levels of government, many important regulatory tools to tackle this problem have been left unused. This 30-minute webinar focuses on federal action, describing what FDA regulation of e-cigarettes looks like currently and highlighting steps the FDA could take to significantly change the trajectory of the e-cigarette epidemic.
On September 12, 2018, the FDA announced “historic action,” issuing 1,300 enforcement actions against retailers for selling Juul and other e-cigarettes to minors. While robust enforcement is a critical element of the FDA’s response to the public health crisis caused by JUUL and other similar products, there is a lot of information about the FDA’s efforts that the agency did not highlight. We’ve combed through the FDA’s enforcement data to find out whether the FDA’s actions are proportionate to the public health threat posed by Juul. This 30-minute mini-webinar highlights our findings.
The 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) is an accord reached between the state Attorneys General of 46 states, five U.S. territories, the District of Columbia and the four largest cigarette manufacturers in America concerning the advertising, marketing, promotion of cigarettes, and compensation for health-care costs connected to tobacco-related illness.
Menthol cigarettes, which continue to be used disproportionately by racial and ethnic minority smokers, LGBT smokers, and youth, are largely responsible for tobacco-related health disparities among these groups. Despite this, menthol flavored tobacco products continue to be widely available throughout the U.S. In recent years, a growing number of communities have taken steps to regulate menthol tobacco products, including restricting the sale of these products. This webinar gives a brief overview of the U.S.
Heated cigarettes are getting more attention as commercial tobacco product manufacturers tout their marketing success abroad and begin introducing the products into the U.S. market. Although the tobacco industry refers to them as “heat-not-burn” products, this term is a misnomer that attempts to downplay the harm of using these products. This webinar includes an overview of this category of products, describes products currently available on the U.S. market, and explains how heated cigarettes fit into a comprehensive regulatory scheme.
Food and drinks high in sugar, calories, and salt can cause chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure. A crucial step in reducing these diet-related diseases, and obesity too, is creating food environments that support healthy choices. In Kansas, public agencies offer food and beverages to thousands of employees, community members, clients, and visitors every day, providing them an important opportunity to promote healthy options.
This is the second in our series of Tobacco Control Legal Consortium/Public Health Law Center webinars on the emergence of JUUL, the e-cigarette product that has become extremely popular among kids and adults alike. In this webinar, legal and policy experts discuss the recent steps that the FDA has taken to regulate JUUL and other e-cigarette products, as well as options for state and local governments to supplement and enhance federal regulation.
This webinar has already occurred. Please use the resources below:
Many public health regulations, including advertising restrictions on tobacco products and required warning labels for sugar sweetened beverages, have faced legal challenges as impermissible restrictions on protected First Amendment free speech. While these cases involve complicated issues, legal experts will provide, in easy-to-understand terms, a general overview of the First Amendment and a current assessment of how courts view different types of public health regulations in both the commercial tobacco control and the health eating and active living realms.
This webinar familiarizes participants with JUUL, a relatively new, discreet, and best-selling e-cigarette brand that is very popular among youth and young adults. Policy, legal, and advocacy experts describe JUUL and discuss concerns and emerging reports about youth and young adult use, ease of use without detection, potential health risks, and regulatory gaps and opportunities.
Exploring, creating, or sharing tobacco control strategies or policies? Need the latest federal, state and local resources and data to support your work? This webinar showcases a variety of handy online resources that anyone in tobacco control – local, state, and federal public health advocates and professionals, researchers, policymakers, attorneys, as well as private citizens – will find of use. Presenters highlight a collection of legislative and health data found on the CDC’s State Tobacco Activities Tracking & Evaluation (STATE) system website and the Office on Sm
Preemptive policies and preemption-based legal challenges can block state and local advances in tobacco control and public health and derail important initiatives. In this first of a series of Consortium and Public Health Law Center webinars on the impact of preemption on public health and safety, public health experts provide a general background on preemption and how it has been used to weaken, impede, and defeat tobacco control, healthy eating, active living, and other public health policies.
Major changes are being proposed to the Minnesota Food Code for the first time since 1995. The proposed revisions address a wide range of food safety considerations impacting many areas of the food system, including food processing and preparation, sales and donation across Minnesota. Some of these changes may have particular impacts for local healthy food access and hunger relief efforts in local communities.